He Saw and Believed
Easter Day Year C
John 20: 1 — 10
Introduction
This Gospel passage for our meditation is from the Easter Day
readings. For a number of reasons we have not presented a verse by verse
commentary. Instead we offer a chapter from a source we regularly quote, Bishop
John Charles Ryle, DD. who published this work in 1908. It seemed of
particular interest, and complements some of the more modern commentaries on St
John's Gospel. If we can see beyond the old King James version used, the lack of
inclusive language, and a few areas of theological disagreement, we will still find an excellent aid to help us in our Easter
week meditations.
Expository Thoughts
"The chapter we have now begun takes us from Christ's
death to Christ's resurrection. Like Matthew, Mark and Luke, John dwells on
these two great events with peculiar fullness and particularity. And we need not
wonder. The whole of saving Christianity hinges on the two facts, that Christ
died for our sins, and rose again for our justification. The chapter before our
eyes deserves special attention. Of all the four evangelists, none supplies such
deeply interesting evidence of the resurrection, as the disciple whom Jesus
loved.
We are taught in the passage before us, that those who love
Christ most are those who have received most benefit from Him.
The first whom St John names among those who came to Christ's
sepulchre, is Mary Magdalene. The history of this faithful woman, no doubt, is
hidden in much obscurity. A vast amount of needless obloquy (abuse) has been
heaped upon her memory as if she was once an habitual sinner against the seventh
commandment. Yet there is literally no evidence whatever that she was anything
of the kind! But we are distinctly told that she was one out of whom the Lord
had cast "seven devils" (Mark 16: 9; Luke 8: 2), — one who had been
subjected in a peculiar way to Satan's possession, — and one whose gratitude to
our Lord for deliverance was a gratitude that knew no bounds. In short, of all
our Lord's followers on earth, none seem to have loved Him so much as Mary
Magdalene. None felt that they owed so much to Christ. None felt so strongly
that there was nothing too great to do for Christ. Hence, as Bishop Andrews
beautifully puts it, — "She was last at His cross, and first at His grave.
She stayed longest there and was soonest here. She could not rest till she was up
to seek Him. She sought Him while it was yet dark, even before she had light to
seek Him by." In a word, having received much, she loved much; and loving
much, she did much, in order to prove the reality of her love.
The case before us throws broad and clear light on a question,
which ought to be deeply interesting to every true hearted servant of Christ.
How is it that many who profess and call themselves Christians, do so little for
the Saviour whose name they bear? How is it that many, whose faith and grace it
would be uncharitable to deny, work so little, give so little, say so little,
take so little pains, to promote Christ's cause, and bring glory to Christ in
the world? — These questions admit of only one answer. It is a low sense of debt
and obligation to Christ, which is the amount of the whole matter. Where sin is
not felt at all, nothing is done; and where sin is little felt, little is done.
The man who is deeply conscious of his own guilt and corruption, and deeply
convinced that without the blood and intercession of Christ he would sink
deservedly into the lowest hell, this is the man who will spend and be spent for
Jesus, and think he can never do enough to show forth His praise. Let us daily
pray that we may see the sinfulness of sin, and the amazing grace of Christ,
more clearly and distinctly. Then, and then only, shall we cease to be cool and
lukewarm, and slovenly in our work for Jesus. Then, and then only, shall we
understand the burning zeal of Mary; and comprehend what Paul meant when he
said, "The love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge that if
One died for all, then were all dead: and that He died for all, that they which
live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for
them, and rose again." (2 Cor 5: 14 — 15.)
We are taught, secondly, in these verses, that there are
widely different temperaments in different believers.
This is a point which is curiously brought out in the conduct
of Peter and John, when Mary Magdalene told them that the Lord's body was gone.
We are told that they both ran to the sepulchre; but John the disciple whom
Jesus loved, outran Peter, and reached the empty grave first. Then comes out the
difference between the two men. John, of the two more gentle, quiet, tender,
reserved, retiring, deep-feeling, stooped down and looked in, but went no
further. Peter, more hot, and zealous, and impulsive, and fervent, and forward,
cannot be content without going down into the sepulchre, and actually seeing
with his own eyes. Both, we may be sure, were deeply attached to the Lord. The
hearts of both, at this critical juncture, were full of hopes, and fears, and
anxieties, and expectations, all tangled together. Yet each behaves in his own
characteristic fashion. We need not doubt that these things were intentionally
written for our learning.
Let us learn, from the case before us, to make allowances for
wide varieties in the inward character of believers. To do so will save us much
trouble in the journey of life and prevent many an uncharitable thought. Let us
not judge brethren harshly, and set them down in a low place, because they do
not see or feel things exactly as we see and feel and because things do not
affect or strike them just as they affect and strike us. The flowers in the
Lord's garden are not all of one colour and one scent, though they are all
planted by one Spirit. The subjects of His kingdom are not all exactly one tone
and temperament, though they all love the same Saviour, and their names are in
the same book of life. The Church of Christ has some in its ranks who are like
Peter, and some who are like John; and a place for all, and a work for all to
do. Let us love all who love Christ in sincerity, and thank God that they love
Him at all. The great thing is to love Jesus.
We are taught, finally, in these verses, that there may be
much ignorance even in true believers.
This is a point, which is brought out here with singular force
and distinctness. John himself, the writer of this Gospel, records of himself
and his companion Peter, "As yet they knew not the Scripture, that He must
rise again from the dead." How truly wonderful this seems! For three long
years these two leading Apostles had heard our Lord speak of His own
resurrection as a fact, and yet they had not understood Him. Again and again He
had staked the truth of His Messiahship on His rising from the dead, and yet
they had never taken in His meaning. We little realize the power over the mind
which is exercised by wrong teaching in childhood, and by early prejudices
imbibed in our youth. Surely the Christian minister has little right to complain
of ignorance of Peter and John, under the teaching of Christ Himself.
After all we must remember that true grace, and not head
knowledge, is the one thing needful. We are in the hands of a merciful and
compassionate Saviour, who passes by and pardons much ignorance, when He sees
"a heart right in the sight of God." Some things indeed we must know,
and without knowing them we cannot be saved. Our own sinfulness and guilt, the
office of Christ as a Saviour, the necessity of repentance and faith, — such
things as these are essential to salvation. But he that knows these things may,
in other respects be a very ignorant man. In fact, the extent to which one man
may have grace together with much ignorance, and another may have much knowledge
and yet no grace is one of the greatest mysteries in religion, and one which the
last day alone will unfold. Let us always seek knowledge, and be ashamed of
ignorance. But let us not despair because our knowledge is imperfect, and, above
all, let us make sure that, like Peter and John, we have grace and right
hearts."

|